3/21/2023 0 Comments Entity framework vs dapper![]() ![]() In contrast, Entity Framework has a much steeper learning curve.Īnother plus of Dapper is that you don't have to completely abandon Entity Framework in order to use it. Joins are a bit trickier but easy enough to be learned within a day. Everything revolves around writing the query in SQL and sending in some parameters. Barely any difference between this piece of code and the one with the WHERE clause. It's kind of becoming obvious at this point. using (var conn = new INTO (,, ) VALUES = name, Let's take a look at inserting in Dapper. It kind of puts into perspective how much of the work Entity Framework does for us under the hood. But the extra code that needs to be written is usually negligible. This is because its mapping mechanism is more primitive than the one that Entity Framework employs so there's a bit more boiler-plate to it. You probably noticed that Dapper is more verbose. ![]() Song song = * FROM WHERE = new ) Īnd here's a Dapper example of an INNER JOIN: using (var conn = new SqlConnection(_connectionString)) Using (var conn = new SqlConnection(_connectionString)) Here's a comparison of doing some basic SELECT queries in Entity Framework VS Dapper: // Entity Framework But what good are words without an example. Testing what you wrote is as simple as copying and pasting it into Management Studio. So since the veil of abstraction is so thin you get comfortable with it in no time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |